Criticism of quotations

It criticises some famous sentences though as very intelligent ones which are false (they only would be saved bearing in mind intentional porpoise and what they represent in context), for what they show (even better for what they try to express or represent)

 

1-       I Just know, that I know nothing

 ANSWER:  (It is not)… So ¡He knows something!

In any case it would be: I know very little in comparison with what I don´ t know, or even, I know much less than I don’t know.

 

2-       Be yourself

ANSWER: So, who hells are going to be you? (if whatever you do you are going to be you in the end. If by “x” you´ re going to be “x” and by “y” you are going to be “y”)

 But you will always be yourself, and If you change you will not be the same, you` l be the same changed, but the same in any case, so, where is the sense?

 

3-       I think, so I exist

ANSWER:  What about if I did not think? Would I exist? , and what about a little pig?.. ok, that supposing that or admitting that the little pig were able to think, it could be.

What about a stone?  Does exist without being able to think? In any case, and being fair, it would be: I think, so I know that I exist.

 

4-       To be or not to be, that´ s the question

ANSWER:  It doesn´ t matter if you aren`t. You aren`t at any case (and that is not the question at any case). The bad thing is “to be”, and “to be” in a dire sense (that indeed would be the question and not precisely in a good sense). But if it is in a good sense it would the question too, but in a good sense. As we have said: if it isn´t the question it isn´t at all, and that is not a question in any case

5-       I am myself and my circumstances

ANSWER: All right!… , and the collection of  “all”  factors that exist in your being  because of what you are (including you, your circumstances, circumstances beyond your control, external factors that determine you (realizing yourself or not realizing of them). Example of other people `s circumstances that affect you: a neighbour that lends you money when you are in economical difficulties. He can lend you the money if he wants, or the opposite.

 

And in the same way a series of sentences that very conceit and even in a pretty and sweetly-sound way are though to tell too much things but actually in a philosophical sense they don´t tell anything, or at least anything strictly rigorous.